PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.05%
Positive revenue growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.81%
Positive gross profit growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3.70%
EBIT growth below 50% of FNV's 159.37%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.70%
Operating income growth under 50% of FNV's 149.86%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
1.68%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 144.39%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.44%
EPS growth under 50% of FNV's 140.74%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while FNV stands at 3.68%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
0.08%
OCF growth under 50% of FNV's 1.82%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
0.03%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
723.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 148.47%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
182.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 148.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
306.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 127.32%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
640.28%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 448.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
242.27%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 448.47%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
441.69%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 183.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
581.35%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 486.60%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
268.71%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 486.60%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
644.65%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of FNV's 783.67%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
3089.26%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 30.83%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
147.25%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 30.83%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
86.70%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 54.58%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.82%
Our AR growth while FNV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.65%
Asset growth at 50-75% of FNV's 8.15%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
4.10%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FNV's 1.68%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-9.08%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.17%
We expand SG&A while FNV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.