Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Revenue growth above 1.5x FNV's 8.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.

Positive gross profit growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Slight or no buybacks while FNV is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.

Slight or no buyback while FNV is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.

OCF growth above 1.5x FNV's 26.38%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.

Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 88.04%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 88.04%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 11.19%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 79.79%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 79.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.

3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 71.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.

Positive 10Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 53.79%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 53.79%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 27.89%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Firm’s AR is declining while FNV shows 7.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

Positive asset growth while FNV is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

SG&A declining or stable vs. FNV's 38.10%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.