PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.89%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-39.72%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-39.72%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-39.72%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-46.70%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-47.37%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-45.95%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.11%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.07%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.16%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.37%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
100.02%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
300.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 55.53%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
111.87%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 55.53%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
69.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 8.08%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1505.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 61.82%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
120.11%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 61.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
80.71%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 60.90%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
1009.06%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 49.43% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
92.68%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 49.43%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
29.05%
Positive short-term CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2727.43%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 36.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
151.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 36.47%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
68.17%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 20.10%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.55%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.10%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.37%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
4.84%
Debt growth of 4.84% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.62%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.