PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.22%
Negative revenue growth while FNV stands at 4.10%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
1.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FNV's 11.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1.53%
EBIT growth below 50% of FNV's 151.70%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.53%
Operating income growth under 50% of FNV's 151.37%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-15.01%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 143.92%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while FNV is at 143.64%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FNV is at 143.64%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-7.83%
Negative OCF growth while FNV is at 55.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-109.37%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
436.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 134.13%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
232.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 114.19%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
3.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 12.94%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
5716.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 294.21%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
275.62%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 103.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-10.86%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
355.00%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 321.70%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
299.42%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 535.27%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-35.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FNV is 32.35%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
4976.04%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 20.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 42.33%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
41.54%
Positive short-term equity growth while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while FNV invests at 98.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-13.59%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Positive asset growth while FNV is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.93%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FNV's 0.02%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.04%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
SG&A growth well above FNV's 10.53%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.