PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.63%
Positive revenue growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.27%
Positive gross profit growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
9.27%
Positive EBIT growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
9.27%
Positive operating income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-92.92%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-94.44%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-94.44%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.20%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 2.58%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 2.63%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-60.06%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
17.39%
OCF growth under 50% of FNV's 65.12%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
8.48%
FCF growth under 50% of FNV's 98.85%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.92%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 94.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-11.70%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
154.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 50.63%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
132.02%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 47.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-29.04%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
118.90%
Similar net income/share CAGR to FNV's 122.76%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
-88.28%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FNV is 99.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-96.72%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-65.69%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FNV stands at 51.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
91.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 38.03%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
40.25%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 17.13%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 23.77%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-64.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of FNV's 13.92%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.66%
Under 50% of FNV's 11.31%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.03%
Debt growth of 0.03% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.