PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.03%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
5.03%
Positive gross profit growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
5.03%
EBIT growth below 50% of FNV's 142.37%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.03%
Operating income growth under 50% of FNV's 126.87%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-5.02%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 1500.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-7.14%
Negative EPS growth while FNV is at 1478.95%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-7.14%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FNV is at 1478.95%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while FNV stands at 3.26%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-5.30%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-962.45%
Negative FCF growth while FNV is at 109.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
265.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 131.00%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
40.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 109.11%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-37.68%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
679.42%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 304.59%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
42.85%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to FNV's 43.39%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
-48.13%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
329.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 115.13% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2.22%
Below 50% of FNV's 78.85%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-67.99%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1148.91%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 26.04%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 19.20%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
52.76%
Positive short-term equity growth while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.08%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.35%
Positive asset growth while FNV is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
22.01%
Positive BV/share change while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-19.88%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.79%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.