PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.83%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FNV's 16.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
16.30%
Positive gross profit growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.77%
Positive EBIT growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.77%
Positive operating income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-76.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-75.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-75.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.35%
Share reduction while FNV is at 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.35%
Reduced diluted shares while FNV is at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
6.53%
Dividend growth above 1.5x FNV's 1.96%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
34.00%
Positive OCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-875.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
425.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 81.98%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
17.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 15.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-38.61%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
697.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 13.93%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-6.31%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-53.81%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-1205.32%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-220.54%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-183.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FNV is 13.64%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
619.11%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 40.62%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
60.71%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 9.16%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
17.50%
Positive short-term equity growth while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.65%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-43.68%
Firm’s AR is declining while FNV shows 30.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
12.44%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 10.95%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
-4.09%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
126.58%
Debt growth of 126.58% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
We expand SG&A while FNV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.