PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.48%
Negative revenue growth while FNV stands at 8.82%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-16.49%
Negative gross profit growth while FNV is at 34.94%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-22.71%
Negative EBIT growth while FNV is at 212.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-22.71%
Negative operating income growth while FNV is at 205.81%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
124.21%
Net income growth at 50-75% of FNV's 195.54%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
123.81%
EPS growth at 50-75% of FNV's 190.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
123.81%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of FNV's 190.00%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while FNV stands at 12.54%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-14.72%
Negative OCF growth while FNV is at 63.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
114.79%
FCF growth above 1.5x FNV's 54.26%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
233.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 161.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
3.82%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 26.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-19.84%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FNV stands at 6.70%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
275.60%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 442.07%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-21.68%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV is at 1.77%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-39.59%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV stands at 13.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
36.10%
Below 50% of FNV's 215.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-70.63%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-72.98%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
379.39%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 47.85%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
52.05%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 18.42%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
13.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 16.14%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while FNV stands at 120.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.29%
Our AR growth while FNV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.23%
Negative asset growth while FNV invests at 13.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.14%
Under 50% of FNV's 23.18%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.62%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FNV's 86.21%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.