Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Negative revenue growth while FNV stands at 5.77%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Negative EBIT growth while FNV is at 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Negative operating income growth while FNV is at 1.39%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.

Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.

Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.

Negative OCF growth while FNV is at 15.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

FCF growth under 50% of FNV's 89.27%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.

Negative 5Y CAGR while FNV stands at 36.30%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 38.70%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV is at 59.62%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV stands at 70.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FNV is at 183.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FNV is 16.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of FNV's 188.98%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.

Below 50% of FNV's 23.21%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while FNV stands at 3.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

We have a declining book value while FNV shows 0.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.

Debt growth of 44.33% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.