PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.17%
Negative revenue growth while FNV stands at 9.50%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
0.25%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FNV's 10.13%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3.15%
EBIT growth 50-75% of FNV's 6.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
3.15%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of FNV's 5.56%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
2.06%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 11.52%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 0.64%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 1.09%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
3.61%
Dividend growth at 50-75% of FNV's 6.61%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders.
-7.33%
Negative OCF growth while FNV is at 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-7.91%
Negative FCF growth while FNV is at 203.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
88.45%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to FNV's 90.53%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
31.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 73.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-14.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FNV stands at 54.14%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
42.03%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 174.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
16.03%
Below 50% of FNV's 112.30%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-25.58%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV stands at 40.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
16.64%
Below 50% of FNV's 69.69%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
23.39%
Below 50% of FNV's 7707.24%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
603.37%
Below 50% of FNV's 2435.18%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
136.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 55.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
21.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with FNV's 22.92%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
6.29%
Below 50% of FNV's 13.23%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.38%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 26.36%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
47.34%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 6.64%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
17.16%
AR growth well above FNV's 14.25%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
Asset growth above 1.5x FNV's 0.20%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.16%
75-90% of FNV's 2.54%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-13.66%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.41%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FNV's 91.07%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.