PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.14%
Positive revenue growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
28.42%
Positive gross profit growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
30.60%
Positive EBIT growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
30.60%
Positive operating income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
22.41%
Positive net income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.53%
Positive EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.53%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while FNV stands at 2.28%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
34.67%
OCF growth above 1.5x FNV's 5.74%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
35.67%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
126.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 280.53%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
61.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 81.98%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
26.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 31.24%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
135.70%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 233.24%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
65.00%
Below 50% of FNV's 132.41%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
45.99%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 53.56%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
62.55%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
59.02%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
52.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
125.25%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 45.26%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-2.02%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FNV is at 21.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
3.78%
Below 50% of FNV's 10.08%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.93%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.20%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.65%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-18.14%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.92%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.