PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.68%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.85%
Positive gross profit growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-6.90%
Negative EBIT growth while FNV is at 173.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.90%
Negative operating income growth while FNV is at 173.78%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
11.50%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 195.55%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.29%
EPS growth under 50% of FNV's 196.15%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FNV's 196.15%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.19%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 0.42%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.26%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.42%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-14.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
99.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 74.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
35.84%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 47.15%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
22.28%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 14.04%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
73.19%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 172.30%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
25.11%
Below 50% of FNV's 105.90%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
19.89%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 13.37%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
51.85%
Below 50% of FNV's 105.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
77.41%
Below 50% of FNV's 260.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
54.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of FNV's 97.66%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
123.94%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 53.08%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
9.22%
Below 50% of FNV's 25.71%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
6.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to FNV's 5.86%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.08%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 40.73%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
56.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 18.38%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
94433.33%
Our AR growth while FNV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
Asset growth well under 50% of FNV's 4.02%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.22%
Similar to FNV's 3.54%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-10.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
SG&A growth well above FNV's 88.71%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.