PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.24%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FNV's 1.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
8.19%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FNV's 3.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
7.00%
Positive EBIT growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
7.00%
Positive operating income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
3.04%
Positive net income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2.86%
Positive EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while FNV stands at 5.30%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
11.63%
Positive OCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-63.01%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
60.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 158.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
54.95%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 104.37%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
60.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 73.69%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
43.28%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 101.16%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
82.95%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 97.66%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
82.43%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 58.77%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
4.10%
Below 50% of FNV's 394.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
254.38%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 399.24%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
134.22%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of FNV's 158.39%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
90.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 40.16%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
25.60%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 18.36%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
16.45%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to FNV's 16.35%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while FNV stands at 184.81%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.20%
Firm’s AR is declining while FNV shows 9.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-31.41%
Inventory is declining while FNV stands at 460.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.48%
Negative asset growth while FNV invests at 2.76%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.90%
50-75% of FNV's 3.20%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-98.25%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.98%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FNV's 138.46%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.