PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.94%
Revenue growth under 50% of FNV's 12.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
3.70%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FNV's 12.94%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.01%
Negative EBIT growth while FNV is at 7.54%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.01%
Negative operating income growth while FNV is at 7.21%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
2.54%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 2.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
2.78%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 2.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
2.78%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 2.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.13%
Share change of 0.13% while FNV is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.78%
Negative OCF growth while FNV is at 9.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
97.38%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
33.15%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 107.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
50.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 114.12%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
53.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 109.56%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
0.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 218.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
56.40%
Below 50% of FNV's 177.34%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
57.62%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 114.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-11.94%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FNV is at 235.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
167.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 285.78%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-48.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FNV is 218.49%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
90.57%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 48.96%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
19.17%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 29.84%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
11.80%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 20.16%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
666.81%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 195.54%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
173.48%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 44.10%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
57.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 25.76%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
139.98%
AR growth well above FNV's 13.10%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-1.95%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.89%
Asset growth well under 50% of FNV's 3.62%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.93%
50-75% of FNV's 3.51%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-4.69%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.08%
SG&A growth well above FNV's 67.74%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.