PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.44%
Revenue growth similar to FNV's 3.60%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
-0.52%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
3.37%
EBIT growth below 50% of FNV's 35.58%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.37%
Operating income growth under 50% of FNV's 35.72%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
116.27%
Net income growth above 1.5x FNV's 33.07%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
116.67%
EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 32.18%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
116.67%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 32.18%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while FNV cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-2.98%
Negative OCF growth while FNV is at 34.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-154.52%
Negative FCF growth while FNV is at 30.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
13.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 89.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
5.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 92.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
39.64%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 114.15%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-6.33%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV stands at 130.98%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
9.59%
Below 50% of FNV's 108.68%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
77.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 176.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
58.27%
Below 50% of FNV's 243.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
2532.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 4575.72%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
4117.56%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 783.51%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
84.86%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 14.02%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
24.04%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 3.91%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
19.25%
Positive short-term equity growth while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
41.31%
Below 50% of FNV's 105.15%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
147.79%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 37.21%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
64.03%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 41.59%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
7.97%
Our AR growth while FNV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
42.63%
We show growth while FNV is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.12%
Positive asset growth while FNV is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.09%
Positive BV/share change while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.08%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 52.52%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.95%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FNV's 108.70%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.