PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.44%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FNV's 3.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
19.36%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FNV's 9.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
12.09%
Positive EBIT growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
12.09%
Positive operating income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-46.04%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-46.15%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-46.15%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.13%
Slight or no buybacks while FNV is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.05%
Slight or no buyback while FNV is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while FNV stands at 8.70%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
7.81%
Positive OCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
251.29%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
20.66%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 135.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
51.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 82.67%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
34.55%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 83.81%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
0.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 100.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
71.89%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to FNV's 79.23%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
75.55%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 56.65%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
-16.12%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FNV is at 183.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
151.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 271.64%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
170.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to FNV's 172.30%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
80.17%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 47.60%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
24.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 38.41%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
19.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 28.02%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
118.73%
AR growth well above FNV's 20.62%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-15.06%
Inventory is declining while FNV stands at 53.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.76%
Asset growth well under 50% of FNV's 31.41%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.46%
Under 50% of FNV's 31.63%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.09%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.24%
SG&A growth well above FNV's 3.13%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.