PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.41%
Negative revenue growth while FNV stands at 3.98%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-9.76%
Negative gross profit growth while FNV is at 7.52%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-6.19%
Negative EBIT growth while FNV is at 5.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.19%
Negative operating income growth while FNV is at 9.25%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-5.33%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 7.97%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-5.71%
Negative EPS growth while FNV is at 8.42%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-5.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FNV is at 8.42%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.14%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.10%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.09%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.10%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
Negative OCF growth while FNV is at 11.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
15.97%
FCF growth above 1.5x FNV's 8.57%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
17.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 157.41%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
48.43%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 103.78%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
57.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 101.57%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-6.51%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV stands at 192.54%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
61.94%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 92.48%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
86.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 110.75%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
-17.41%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FNV is at 299.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
115.73%
Below 50% of FNV's 307.79%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
218.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to FNV's 199.51%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
76.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 52.91%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
24.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 28.85%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
23.93%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to FNV's 26.54%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
44.13%
Below 50% of FNV's 125.12%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
119.91%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 51.24%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
82.04%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 42.57%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-46.31%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
61.49%
We show growth while FNV is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-0.33%
Negative asset growth while FNV invests at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.92%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FNV's 0.23%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-9.45%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.46%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.