PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.14%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-3.04%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1.06%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.06%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-32.95%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-32.43%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-32.43%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.10%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 0.18%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while FNV stands at 19.86%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-21.46%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-60.38%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-18.34%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while FNV stands at 93.17%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
5.34%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 53.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-16.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FNV stands at 12.82%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-36.08%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV stands at 108.61%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
5.49%
Below 50% of FNV's 47.08%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-24.69%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV stands at 5.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-34.59%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FNV is at 236.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
60.03%
Below 50% of FNV's 133.52%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
16.20%
Below 50% of FNV's 255.56%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
65.46%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 58.55%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
35.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with FNV's 34.20%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
28.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to FNV's 31.42%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.98%
Firm’s AR is declining while FNV shows 11.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-37.75%
Inventory is declining while FNV stands at 400.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.15%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 1.72%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
1.34%
75-90% of FNV's 1.58%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-10.20%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
We expand SG&A while FNV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.