95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.55%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 19.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
29.24%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FNV's 17.28%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
37.10%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FNV's 14.77%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
37.10%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FNV's 16.50%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
26.98%
Net income growth above 1.5x FNV's 17.89%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
28.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 18.29%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
28.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 19.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.12%
Share change of 0.12% while FNV is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.09%
Diluted share change of 0.09% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.79%
OCF growth above 1.5x FNV's 24.83%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
10.57%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
24.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 169.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 97.25%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
5.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 66.50%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
26.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 191.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
46.48%
Below 50% of FNV's 126.94%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
32.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 71.96%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
55.82%
Below 50% of FNV's 550.17%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-56.49%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FNV is 231.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
32.42%
Below 50% of FNV's 92.75%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
66.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with FNV's 65.60%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
27.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 37.06%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
25.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 29.92%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
13.23%
Below 50% of FNV's 72.50%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
101.95%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 63.61%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
59.08%
3Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 47.13%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the company's short-term profits or payout policy justify these higher hikes.
-26.61%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-24.39%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.37%
Negative asset growth while FNV invests at 2.47%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.38%
Under 50% of FNV's 2.36%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
269.36%
Debt growth far above FNV's 3.20%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.96%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.