PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
44.37%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FNV's 0.77%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
43.20%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FNV's 1.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
47.82%
Positive EBIT growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
47.82%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FNV's 1.28%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
44.74%
Positive net income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
52.00%
Positive EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
52.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 0.04%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.02%
Slight or no buyback while FNV is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
3.51%
Dividend growth under 50% of FNV's 8.89%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
45.21%
OCF growth above 1.5x FNV's 22.96%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-388.43%
Negative FCF growth while FNV is at 187.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
51.80%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 137.06%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
60.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 102.78%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
11.68%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 1.56%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
57.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 437.97%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
124.71%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 185.91%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
18.55%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 16.82%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
41.52%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2319.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
6.30%
Positive short-term CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
62.87%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 47.95%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
31.82%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 20.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
20.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 5.08%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
68.43%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 97.30%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
95.52%
5Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 86.80%. Bruce Berkowitz verifies that high dividend hikes remain sustainable, not a sign of over-distribution.
45.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 52.62%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
-1.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-43.80%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.74%
Positive asset growth while FNV is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.55%
Positive BV/share change while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.75%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.62%
We expand SG&A while FNV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.