PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.09%
Revenue growth under 50% of FNV's 7.32%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.25%
Positive gross profit growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
4.11%
EBIT growth below 50% of FNV's 11.54%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
4.11%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of FNV's 7.69%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
26.42%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 92.08%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
25.93%
EPS growth under 50% of FNV's 92.68%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.93%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FNV's 92.68%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.05%
Share change of 0.05% while FNV is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.04%
Diluted share change of 0.04% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-49.72%
Dividend reduction while FNV stands at 1.33%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
8.76%
OCF growth at 75-90% of FNV's 10.00%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
20.73%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
46.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 100.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 13.60%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
13.77%
Positive 3Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
66.91%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 103.91%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
76.04%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 21.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
25.43%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 2.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
2617.04%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 259.60% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
100.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 45.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
13.76%
Positive short-term CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
59.30%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 35.07%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
37.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 18.53%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
20.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 1.55%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
208.45%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 115.18%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
111.38%
5Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 80.37%. Bruce Berkowitz verifies that high dividend hikes remain sustainable, not a sign of over-distribution.
21.38%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 30.21%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
35.90%
AR growth well above FNV's 10.75%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above FNV's 0.01%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.90%
Asset growth at 50-75% of FNV's 2.59%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
1.34%
50-75% of FNV's 2.44%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-1.26%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.27%
SG&A growth well above FNV's 0.02%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.