PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.97%
Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
10.64%
Positive gross profit growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
13.90%
Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
13.42%
Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
15.07%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
14.29%
Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
14.29%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.04%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 0.11%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 0.29%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.01%
Positive OCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-74.72%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
172.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 149.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
100.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 188.92%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
65.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 30.54%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
238.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 454.31%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
170.21%
Below 50% of FSM's 992.62%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
100.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 34.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
384.37%
Below 50% of FSM's 6543.50%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
173.02%
Below 50% of FSM's 468.05%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
95.04%
Below 50% of FSM's 2013.63%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
53.97%
Below 50% of FSM's 125.85%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
40.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 20.47%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
19.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 1.72%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
282.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 282.43% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
76.17%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.17% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
25.66%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 25.66% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
147.04%
Our AR growth while FSM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Positive asset growth while FSM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.43%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.78%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
1.99%
Debt shrinking faster vs. FSM's 9.18%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.