PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
88831098.78%
Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
88831098.78%
Positive gross profit growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
392.41%
Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
392.41%
Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-377.97%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-350.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-350.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
285.84%
Positive OCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
285.84%
Positive FCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
355.10%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 149.07%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
355.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 188.92%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
355.10%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 30.54%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.75%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FSM stands at 125.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-3.75%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FSM is at 20.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-3.75%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FSM is at 1.72%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-137.72%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.