PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-75.96%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-75.96%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-97.83%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-97.83%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
182.08%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
183.33%
Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
183.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.32%
Positive OCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
28.32%
Positive FCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
6.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 149.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
6.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 188.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
6.51%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 30.54%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.03%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
3.80%
We show growth while FSM is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.62%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.62%
We have a declining book value while FSM shows 0.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
339.85%
We expand SG&A while FSM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.