95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.82%
Revenue growth of 19.82% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
26.25%
Gross profit growth of 26.25% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
25.56%
Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
25.56%
Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
29.72%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
33.33%
Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
33.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Slight or no buybacks while FSM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.53%
Slight or no buyback while FSM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.67%
Positive OCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
79.67%
Positive FCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
45.84%
10Y CAGR of 45.84% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-25.79%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
24.33%
3Y CAGR of 24.33% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
569.66%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1286.38%
Positive short-term CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
283.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 171.76%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.91%
Firm’s AR is declining while FSM shows 129.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while FSM stands at 22971144.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.18%
Asset growth well under 50% of FSM's 3364.29%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.26%
Under 50% of FSM's 479.72%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.59%
SG&A growth well above FSM's 5.78%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.