PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.14%
Negative revenue growth while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.47%
Negative gross profit growth while FSM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-7.96%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-7.96%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-5.12%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.05%
Share change of 0.05% while FSM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.31%
Diluted share change of 1.31% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.11%
Negative OCF growth while FSM is at 530.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-14.11%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
46.59%
10Y CAGR of 46.59% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
24.76%
5Y CAGR of 24.76% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
36.40%
3Y CAGR of 36.40% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.23%
Below 50% of FSM's 472.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-45.21%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM stands at 472.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.86%
Positive short-term CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
196.05%
Below 50% of FSM's 990.16%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
188.63%
Below 50% of FSM's 990.16%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
291.55%
Below 50% of FSM's 990.16%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.63%
Firm’s AR is declining while FSM shows 12.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
Asset growth well under 50% of FSM's 34.21%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.14%
Under 50% of FSM's 973.49%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.33%
We cut SG&A while FSM invests at 170.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.