PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
47.14%
Revenue growth under 50% of FSM's 147.18%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
70.16%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FSM's 147.18%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
78.16%
Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
78.16%
Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
96.62%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
84.21%
Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
105.88%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.11%
Similar OCF growth to FSM's 77.35%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
-3124.58%
Negative FCF growth while FSM is at 126.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
81.04%
10Y CAGR of 81.04% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
36841732.28%
5Y CAGR of 36841732.28% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
59.87%
3Y CAGR of 59.87% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1234.52%
Positive OCF/share growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
14311.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26453.71%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
1590.09%
Positive short-term CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
672.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 407.03%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.16%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. FSM's 182.95%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-28.98%
Inventory is declining while FSM stands at 899.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
117.23%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 84.85%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
50.21%
Similar to FSM's 54.05%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.80%
We cut SG&A while FSM invests at 318.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.