PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
84.41%
Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
113.04%
Positive gross profit growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
101.43%
EBIT growth similar to FSM's 93.61%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
101.43%
Operating income growth similar to FSM's 93.61%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
82.56%
Net income growth at 50-75% of FSM's 116.02%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
71.43%
EPS growth at 50-75% of FSM's 116.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
57.14%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FSM's 116.07%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
17.56%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 38.10%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
16.72%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 38.10%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
136.40%
Positive OCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
114.16%
Positive FCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
176.53%
10Y CAGR of 176.53% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
57829388.07%
5Y CAGR of 57829388.07% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
86.27%
3Y CAGR of 86.27% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15049.50%
Positive OCF/share growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
587.16%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15476.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 144.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
542.05%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 144.00%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
753.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 358.97%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while FSM shows 361.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
6.26%
Positive asset growth while FSM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
27.21%
Positive BV/share change while FSM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-88.89%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
226.59%
We expand SG&A while FSM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.