PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.28%
Negative revenue growth while FSM stands at 23.85%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.67%
Negative gross profit growth while FSM is at 22.31%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-6.08%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.08%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
30.00%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
75.00%
Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
75.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.40%
Share count expansion well above FSM's 0.29%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.45%
Slight or no buyback while FSM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.22%
OCF growth under 50% of FSM's 16.87%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
5.22%
Positive FCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
210.94%
10Y CAGR of 210.94% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
149.23%
5Y CAGR of 149.23% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
51.45%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 26.67%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1261.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 411.13%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
330.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
67.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
426.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 23.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
133.14%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 51.55%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1497.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 647.52%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
453.49%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
68.14%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 3.37%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.44%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.67%
Negative asset growth while FSM invests at 3.16%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
6.55%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.49%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-5.88%
We’re deleveraging while FSM stands at 54.85%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.14%
We cut SG&A while FSM invests at 616.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.