95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.12%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FSM's 11.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
25.66%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FSM's 13.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
24.79%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FSM's 13.85%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
24.79%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FSM's 13.85%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
21.19%
Net income growth at 50-75% of FSM's 29.66%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
20.00%
EPS growth at 75-90% of FSM's 25.00%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
23.53%
Similar diluted EPS growth to FSM's 25.00%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
0.10%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 0.34%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 0.65%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.07%
Dividend reduction while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
32.30%
OCF growth at 75-90% of FSM's 38.15%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
35.01%
Positive FCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
145787334.37%
10Y CAGR of 145787334.37% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
152.10%
5Y CAGR of 152.10% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
148.31%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 118.29%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
47649.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 6258.08%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
215.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 348.02%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
197.01%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 97.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
55639.64%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 441.12% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
261.20%
Below 50% of FSM's 675.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
302.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 83.26%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
153.14%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with FSM's 156.18%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
92.18%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 37.49%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.48%
Our AR growth while FSM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.82%
Asset growth well under 50% of FSM's 4.32%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.14%
75-90% of FSM's 2.75%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-7.14%
We’re deleveraging while FSM stands at 11.75%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.32%
SG&A growth well above FSM's 46.78%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.