PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.89%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-39.72%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-39.72%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-39.72%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-46.70%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-47.37%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-45.95%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.11%
Share count expansion well above FSM's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.16%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.37%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
100.02%
Positive FCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
300.67%
10Y CAGR of 300.67% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
111.87%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 165.83%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
69.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of FSM's 81.69%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
1505.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 1249.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
120.11%
Positive OCF/share growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
80.71%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1009.06%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
92.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
29.05%
Positive short-term CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2727.43%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 888.67%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
151.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 63.45%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
68.17%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 50.05%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.55%
Firm’s AR is declining while FSM shows 82.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.10%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.37%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
4.84%
We have some new debt while FSM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.62%
We cut SG&A while FSM invests at 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.