PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.61%
Revenue growth under 50% of FSM's 20.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-0.39%
Negative gross profit growth while FSM is at 27.43%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.39%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.39%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
21.86%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
18.18%
Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
18.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.48%
Slight or no buybacks while FSM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.39%
Slight or no buyback while FSM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-10.15%
Dividend reduction while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
4.99%
OCF growth under 50% of FSM's 285.83%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-6.13%
Negative FCF growth while FSM is at 201.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
238.75%
10Y CAGR of 238.75% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
241.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 5864.78%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
10.52%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 35.12%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
110932.14%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 4315.14%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
343.50%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 138.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-1.33%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM stands at 132.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
1134.29%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
242.41%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-24.60%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
3212.75%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 867.91%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
186.70%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 90.03%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
46.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 6.76%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.02%
Firm’s AR is declining while FSM shows 34.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while FSM stands at 5.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.20%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.91%
Positive BV/share change while FSM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.02%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.28%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.