PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.16%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-18.53%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-18.53%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.53%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-20.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-18.18%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 0.25%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 0.40%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.70%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
1085.59%
Positive FCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
198.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 151.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-24.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FSM stands at 77.87%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
2800.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of FSM's 3630.21%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
222.96%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 5.32%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-39.82%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1699.31%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 253.70% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
186.89%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 75.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-57.64%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
5331.89%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 874.59%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
123.30%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 85.32%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
41.24%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 16.75%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 317.42% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
57.80%
AR growth well above FSM's 48.95%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.00%
Asset growth well under 50% of FSM's 3.91%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.92%
75-90% of FSM's 2.30%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
0.02%
We have some new debt while FSM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.79%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FSM's 8.35%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.