PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.88%
Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.53%
Positive gross profit growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
8.65%
Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.65%
Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
10.43%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
7.14%
Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
7.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 3.50%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 3.39%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.97%
OCF growth under 50% of FSM's 35.02%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
4.72%
FCF growth under 50% of FSM's 159.04%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
141.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 240.12%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
-20.62%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FSM stands at 29.08%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
8.81%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 14.41%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
124.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 244.13%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-42.27%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-1.57%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM stands at 40.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
48.42%
Below 50% of FSM's 339.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-61.72%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FSM is 80.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-13.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FSM is 146.14%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
238.97%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 182.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
41.60%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 64.93%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
16.36%
Below 50% of FSM's 58.32%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.46%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-5.82%
Negative near-term dividend growth while FSM invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
13.77%
AR growth well above FSM's 2.12%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.47%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.03%
Positive BV/share change while FSM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-10.43%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.14%
SG&A growth well above FSM's 9.49%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.