PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.85%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-10.34%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-14.45%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-14.45%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
149.47%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
148.39%
Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
148.39%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-24.07%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-23.82%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
105.28%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 442.25%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-22.48%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FSM stands at 35.79%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
27.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 42.80%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
91.05%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 717.75%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-39.41%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
17.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 88.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
23.01%
Below 50% of FSM's 1228.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-59.13%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FSM is 61.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
15.47%
Below 50% of FSM's 187.96%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
205.07%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 179.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
22.24%
Below 50% of FSM's 66.85%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-6.81%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FSM is at 68.35%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.08%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.80%
Negative asset growth while FSM invests at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.53%
Under 50% of FSM's 2.32%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-13.90%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
We expand SG&A while FSM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.