PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.14%
Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
28.42%
Positive gross profit growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
30.60%
Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
30.60%
Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
22.41%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.53%
Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.53%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
34.67%
Positive OCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
35.67%
FCF growth 50-75% of FSM's 60.91%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
126.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 68.75%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
61.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
26.90%
Positive 3Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
135.70%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 112.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
65.00%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 23.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
45.99%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to FSM's 42.55%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
62.55%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
59.02%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
52.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
125.25%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of FSM's 158.35%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
-2.02%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FSM is at 82.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
3.78%
Below 50% of FSM's 19.12%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.93%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while FSM stands at 2.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.20%
Negative asset growth while FSM invests at 2.32%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.65%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-18.14%
We’re deleveraging while FSM stands at 22.72%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.92%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.