PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
44.37%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FSM's 11.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
43.20%
Positive gross profit growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
47.82%
Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
47.82%
Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
44.74%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
52.00%
Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
52.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 4.78%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.02%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 3.97%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
3.51%
Dividend growth of 3.51% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
45.21%
OCF growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.89%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-388.43%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
51.80%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 203.46%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
60.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 138.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
11.68%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 57.77%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
57.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 159.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
124.71%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 190.36%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
18.55%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 106.19%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
41.52%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2319.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
6.30%
Positive short-term CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
62.87%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 101.86%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
31.82%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 6.58%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
20.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 1.90%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
68.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 68.43% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
95.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 95.52% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
45.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 45.29% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-1.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-43.80%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.74%
Positive asset growth while FSM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.55%
Positive BV/share change while FSM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.75%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.62%
SG&A growth well above FSM's 18.95%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.