PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.62%
Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.89%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FSM's 8.46%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
136.68%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FSM's 51.42%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
147.14%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FSM's 73.83%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
188.14%
Net income growth under 50% of FSM's 415.72%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
194.74%
EPS growth under 50% of FSM's 522.95%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FSM's 423.42%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.01%
Slight or no buybacks while FSM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while FSM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.63%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to FSM's 206.23%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
82.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 219.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
52.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to FSM's 51.34%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.09%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 537.71%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
164.17%
Below 50% of FSM's 780.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
60.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of FSM's 113.44%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.42%
SG&A growth well above FSM's 19.90%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.