95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.97%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of GFI's 13.29%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
10.64%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
13.90%
EBIT growth 50-75% of GFI's 21.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
13.42%
Positive operating income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
15.07%
Net income growth at 50-75% of GFI's 20.26%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
14.29%
EPS growth at 50-75% of GFI's 21.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of GFI's 18.75%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
0.04%
Share change of 0.04% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.05%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.01%
OCF growth at 50-75% of GFI's 27.35%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
-74.72%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 50.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
172.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 137.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
100.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to GFI's 94.05%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
65.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 57.40%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
238.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 334.46%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
170.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 201.20%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
100.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to GFI's 99.42%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
384.37%
Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
173.02%
Below 50% of GFI's 546.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
95.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to GFI's 103.80%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
53.97%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with GFI's 54.65%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
40.97%
Below 50% of GFI's 109.50%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
19.77%
Below 50% of GFI's 44.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
282.43%
Below 50% of GFI's 2248.68%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
76.17%
Below 50% of GFI's 540.54%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
25.66%
Below 50% of GFI's 129.03%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
147.04%
Our AR growth while GFI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Asset growth well under 50% of GFI's 7.05%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.43%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
1.99%
We have some new debt while GFI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.67%
We cut SG&A while GFI invests at 70.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.