PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-75.96%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 22.49%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-75.96%
Negative gross profit growth while GFI is at 89.29%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-97.83%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-97.83%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
182.08%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 130.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
183.33%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 131.25%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
183.33%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 131.25%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.32%
OCF growth under 50% of GFI's 130.31%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
28.32%
Positive FCF growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
6.51%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
6.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 200.93%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
6.51%
Positive 3Y CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.03%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
3.80%
We show growth while GFI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.62%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.62%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
339.85%
SG&A growth of 339.85% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.