95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.10%
Revenue growth under 50% of GFI's 13.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.09%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-47.73%
Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 21.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-47.73%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
4.94%
Net income growth under 50% of GFI's 20.26%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.23%
OCF growth under 50% of GFI's 27.35%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
0.23%
FCF growth under 50% of GFI's 50.03%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
159.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 137.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
191.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 94.05%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
245.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 57.40%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
257.85%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 201.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
2350.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 99.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
230.55%
Below 50% of GFI's 546.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
228.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 103.80%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1189.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 109.50%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1571.05%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 44.58%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.21%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.73%
Asset growth at 75-90% of GFI's 7.05%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
8.82%
50-75% of GFI's 16.39%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.23%
SG&A declining or stable vs. GFI's 70.86%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.