PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.05%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 9.26%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.94%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-8.75%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-8.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-8.35%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-9.09%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-10.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.36%
Slight or no buybacks while GFI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.53%
Slight or no buyback while GFI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.87%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 61.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-6.87%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 1583.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
136.57%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
101.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 139.71%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1165.13%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 188.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1283.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 483.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3452.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
1028.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 60.49%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1193.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 436.11%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1764.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 152.62%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.37%
AR growth of 59.37% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.81%
Asset growth at 75-90% of GFI's 8.02%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
6.28%
Under 50% of GFI's 71.63%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.67%
SG&A growth of 15.67% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.