PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-28.37%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 13.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-23.08%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.72%
Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 21.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-19.72%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-24.94%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-24.00%
Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-26.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 18.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-34.81%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-787.15%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 50.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
565.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 137.33%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
164.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 94.05%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
131.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 57.40%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
89499.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 334.46%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
215.34%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to GFI's 201.20%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
177.71%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 99.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
7607.09%
Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
200.94%
Below 50% of GFI's 546.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
188.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 103.80%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
3166.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 54.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
149.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 109.50%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
75.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 44.58%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.73%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.97%
Asset growth above 1.5x GFI's 7.05%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.82%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
2077.39%
We have some new debt while GFI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.73%
SG&A declining or stable vs. GFI's 70.86%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.