95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.63%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of GFI's 13.29%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
9.27%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
9.27%
EBIT growth below 50% of GFI's 21.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
9.27%
Positive operating income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-92.92%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-94.44%
Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-94.44%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 18.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.20%
Share change of 0.20% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.19%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-60.06%
Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
17.39%
OCF growth at 50-75% of GFI's 27.35%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
8.48%
FCF growth under 50% of GFI's 50.03%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.92%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 94.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-11.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI stands at 57.40%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
154.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 334.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
132.02%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 201.20%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
-29.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 99.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
118.90%
Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-88.28%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while GFI is 546.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-96.72%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI is 103.80%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-65.69%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while GFI stands at 54.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
91.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 109.50%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
40.25%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to GFI's 44.58%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 129.03%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
-64.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of GFI's 7.05%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.66%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.03%
We have some new debt while GFI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
We cut SG&A while GFI invests at 70.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.