PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.36%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-25.34%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-25.34%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-25.34%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1057.27%
Positive net income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1300.00%
Positive EPS growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1300.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.48%
Slight or no buybacks while GFI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
3.44%
Slight or no buyback while GFI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-8.03%
Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 12.05%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-21.81%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 5.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-15.44%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 2.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
299.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 87.35%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
43.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 17.83%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-30.25%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
511.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 582.95%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
22.41%
Below 50% of GFI's 70.28%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-45.18%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 12.63%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
269.19%
Positive 10Y CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-5.47%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-65.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
583.10%
Positive growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
94.31%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
30.33%
Positive short-term equity growth while GFI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.88%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
98.06%
AR growth of 98.06% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.64%
Positive asset growth while GFI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.60%
We have a declining book value while GFI shows 13.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.03%
We have some new debt while GFI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.99%
We expand SG&A while GFI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.