95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.83%
Revenue growth above 1.5x GFI's 0.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
16.30%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.77%
Positive EBIT growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.77%
Positive operating income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-76.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-75.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-75.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.35%
Share reduction while GFI is at 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.35%
Reduced diluted shares while GFI is at 0.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
6.53%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while GFI cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
34.00%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 25.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
-875.03%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 3175.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
425.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 51.75%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
17.39%
Positive 5Y CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-38.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI stands at 25.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
697.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 198.49%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-6.31%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-53.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 2.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1205.32%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-220.54%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-183.76%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
619.11%
Positive growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
60.71%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
17.50%
Positive short-term equity growth while GFI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.65%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-43.68%
Firm’s AR is declining while GFI shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
12.44%
Positive asset growth while GFI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-4.09%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
126.58%
We have some new debt while GFI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
We expand SG&A while GFI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.