PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.82%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of GFI's 13.29%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
27.82%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
33.04%
EBIT growth above 1.5x GFI's 21.34%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
33.04%
Positive operating income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
37.61%
Net income growth above 1.5x GFI's 20.26%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
35.71%
EPS growth above 1.5x GFI's 21.05%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
35.71%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x GFI's 18.75%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.90%
Share change of 0.90% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-47.91%
Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
20.34%
OCF growth at 50-75% of GFI's 27.35%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
-582.88%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 50.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
179.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 137.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
0.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 94.05%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
13.13%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 57.40%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
185.85%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 334.46%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-22.53%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI is at 201.20%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
9.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 99.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
84.25%
Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-50.72%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while GFI is 546.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-13.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI is 103.80%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
302.23%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 54.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
57.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 109.50%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
20.67%
Below 50% of GFI's 44.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.03%
Below 50% of GFI's 540.54%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-56.25%
Negative near-term dividend growth while GFI invests at 129.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-15.57%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.75%
Asset growth above 1.5x GFI's 7.05%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.65%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
90.51%
We have some new debt while GFI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.58%
We cut SG&A while GFI invests at 70.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.