PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.46%
Revenue growth above 1.5x GFI's 11.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
15.06%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
16.70%
EBIT growth below 50% of GFI's 49.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
16.70%
Operating income growth under 50% of GFI's 49.42%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-306.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-306.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-306.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.14%
Share count expansion well above GFI's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x GFI's 1.54%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-9.68%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
27.85%
OCF growth under 50% of GFI's 104.95%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
27.22%
FCF growth under 50% of GFI's 192.50%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
143.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 44.68%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-32.40%
Negative 5Y CAGR while GFI stands at 35.67%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
44.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
141.95%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with GFI's 151.67%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
-47.98%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI is at 27.26%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
46.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 20.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-379.09%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-162.02%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-321.70%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
215.88%
Positive growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
26.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.10%
Positive short-term equity growth while GFI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.02%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while GFI is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
62.84%
3Y dividend/share CAGR similar to GFI's 68.24%. Walter Schloss finds parallel short-term dividend strategies for both companies.
-45.82%
Firm’s AR is declining while GFI shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
Negative asset growth while GFI invests at 0.70%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.45%
We have a declining book value while GFI shows 2.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-9.84%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.