95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.85%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 13.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.34%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-14.45%
Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 21.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-14.45%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
149.47%
Net income growth above 1.5x GFI's 20.26%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
148.39%
EPS growth above 1.5x GFI's 21.05%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
148.39%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x GFI's 18.75%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-24.07%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-23.82%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 50.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
105.28%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 137.33%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
-22.48%
Negative 5Y CAGR while GFI stands at 94.05%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
27.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 57.40%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
91.05%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 334.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-39.41%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI is at 201.20%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
17.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 99.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
23.01%
Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-59.13%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while GFI is 546.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
15.47%
Below 50% of GFI's 103.80%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
205.07%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 54.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
22.24%
Below 50% of GFI's 109.50%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-6.81%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while GFI is at 44.58%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.08%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.80%
Negative asset growth while GFI invests at 7.05%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.53%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-13.90%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
SG&A declining or stable vs. GFI's 70.86%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.