Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 13.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 21.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 18.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Share change of 0.10% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.

Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.

Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.

Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

FCF growth under 50% of GFI's 50.03%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.

Negative 5Y CAGR while GFI stands at 94.05%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 57.40%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.

10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 334.46%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI is at 201.20%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 99.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while GFI is at 40555.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while GFI is 546.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Below 50% of GFI's 109.50%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.

Below 50% of GFI's 44.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while GFI stands at 540.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 129.03%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Asset growth at 75-90% of GFI's 7.05%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.

We have a declining book value while GFI shows 16.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.